- A design defect. The product was unsafe because its very design was flawed. Note that this means the entire product line is defective, not just the particular model that caused the injury.
- A manufacturing defect. The product may be well designed, but it was assembled in a way that made it unsafe. For example, perhaps the paint that coated a child’s toy was toxic or otherwise dangerous.
- A failure to warn. While the product was designed and assembled correctly, the manufacturer failed to include adequate warnings or instructions for its safe use.
Most products liability cases are not based on negligence but rather on what is known as strict liability. This means that manufacturers are held liable for injuries caused by a defective product whether or not they acted negligently. The idea is that a manufacturer – because of its greater wealth, resources, and product knowledge compared with the average consumer – is in a better position to absorb the cost of liability. It’s assumed, too, that a manufacturer would consider that cost when setting the price of its product.
In a strict liability case, it is unnecessary to prove that the manufacturer was negligent. All the injured consumer must show is that the product was defective, that the product was allowed to be sold, and that an injury was caused by the defect in the product.
One factor that makes a products liability case extremely challenging is the ferocity with which the defendant will fight it. Manufacturers have a lot riding on these cases: If a judge or jury agrees that a product was defective and caused harm, other injured consumers will quickly file suit, and once-profitable product lines – and sometimes the companies behind them – can quickly find themselves shut down forever. Little wonder, then, that a manufacturer will devote extensive resources and legal talent to these cases. That makes the obstacles difficult to overcome. But they can be, and are, overcome – when the right law firm is advocating the consumer’s case.
At Mary Alexander & Associates, our attorneys have been taking on products liability cases – and taking on some of the country’s most powerful manufacturers – for over a quarter of a century. We know the nuances of the law, and the strategies that make the difference between winning and losing. We know just how set on victory our opponents are. But that’s all right, because we’re set on winning, too. And as our record and reputation can attest, winning is another thing we know about.
